![]() When there's math screen readers always screw up embedded equationsĭocuments look nice (but it's a lot of work). Write and read LaTeX much more easily than Word or PDF (especially Researchers, they always ask if I have a LaTeX version. ![]() Accessibility: When I communicate with blind.Hasn't changed much in 20 years, so you can still read and compile Cost: Unlike Word, it's free and open source.Work with others as you create your paper. Is easy to include on file in another, you can use tools like git to Collaboration: Because LaTeX is just text files and it.Because LaTeX makes itĮasy to import files, you can share references across many documents Name of your approach, institutions, etc.). These range from typsetting conventions references (e.g., to the Set of macros that vastly improves productivity and consistency. Macros: More generally, skilled LaTeX writers develop a.LaTeX does all of these automatically, and it just works. It is either done manually or requires substantial post-correction. Often has huge issues and requires obnoxious plugins. References: One of my biggest annoyances when I amįorced to work in Word is how hard it is to easily refer toĭifferent chapters, citations, or figures in a way that will beĪutomatically generated.It that it should be at the top or bottom of a page). In LaTeX, you provide suggestions on placement and itĭoes the best it can based on pre-programmed rules (e.g., you tell Gives you that flexibility, and it's hard to ignore the siren call You Do Less: In Word, you are tempted to move images andįigures around to determine the placement.Templates, which require far more fiddling. Templates: Most venues provide LaTeX templates as their.The density $\rho$ gives us the resistance $R=\rho L$ of the Very difficult to have inline math, as it often screws up the Make equations look good, but it's hard to edit. Math look good and allowing you to edit the math later. Equations and Math: LaTeX was designed to give clear andĮffective renderings of math.In my reviewing experience not a rule, but a useful heuristic).īut these are social reasons to use LaTeX, and are not particularlyĬonvincing for pragmatic reasons. With good reason, non-LaTeX papers usually are worse than LaTeX ones LaTeX are greeted with more skepticism than papers that are (and often That you're not really part of the community: papers not written in ![]() Is not written in LaTeX, and in many scientific fields, it's a sign ![]() Sometimes I get asked by a new collaborator why I use LaTeX. If you're a native Chinese speaker, this is a useful For machine learning, there's even official NIPSĪdvice. However, they are a British publication, so ignoreīritish-specific rules (I do have some other points of disagreement, such as Style guide is a good resource for exposing bad habits, and theirĬonventions are reasonable. Look at the end of compilation to see the red flags that it has discovered. The rest is great, however, and you should use it (with the above edits).įor my students, this is included as part of the Makefile for generating papers. I use the British convention for quote marks (which makes more.Resources (including a script you can use with flymake whenĮditing LaTeX documents). Writing, there will be typos and mistakes here. I also realize that, as with every document on Is evolving, my co-authors wouldn't accept my conventions, or the journal Sometimes I have good reasons for deviating: my style Please do not point out places in papers where With some of it sometimes the choices here reflect compromises done to minimizeįriction with co-authors or choices made to minimize paper length (e.g., You'll likely disagree with much of what I say here. In the course of my writing here both for my own reference and for my I collect the arbitrary choices that I've made When writing a document, there are many stylistic choices that are
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |